TORONTO – As Milos Raonic prepares for a challenging first-round match against David Goffin of Belgium Monday night at his hometown Rogers Cup, word is out that his longtime agent at CAA was terminated last fall.
But Amit Naor remains the 27-year-old Canadian’s manager.
Rumours about this had been circulating for awhile. But Daniel Kaplan of Sports Business Journal, an excellent journalist, was able to nail it all down in a story published Monday.
CAA made no official announcement of any kind about the matter.
Out of respect for the extensive work Kaplan did over a significant period of time in breaking this story, we won’t cut and paste it here. Click here to read the piece.
Here is a brief summary.
“Verbal, emotional and sexual harassment”
According to Kaplan, tennis manager Stephanie Lopez, now 28, went to the head of CAA’s tennis division, Steven Heumann last fall alleging that Naor, 51, subjected her to “verbal, emotional and sexual harassment”.
She is currently on leave.
Kaplan also reports that Lopez filed a claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in the spring. Lopez said she “endured multiple incidents of retaliation” from Heumann after the firing.
A CAA spokesperson told Kaplan their investigation determined there was no retaliation.
Kaplan reports that even after he was fired, Naor remained a manager for three CAA clients. And, in that capacity has communication with the company’s agents.
In addition to Raonic, those two other clients also are high profile: Dominic Thiem and Tomas Berdych.
As of last fall, on the official ATP list (likely not exhaustive or 100 per cent accurate), Thiem was listed officially as being represented by his coach, Gunther Bresnik although Kaplan reports that both Bresnik and Naor manage Thiem’s affairs.
Fadi Shalabi of Sporting Advantage Monaco was listed for Berdych. Naor is listed for Raonic.
Also on Naor’s client list as of last fall were Ernests Gulbis, Taylor Fritz, Bradley Klahn and Bernard Tomic.
Naor represented Jack Sock early in his career. He also handled Novak Djokovic’s business affairs very early on – a decade ago – before Djokovic signed with CAA and Naor also joined the company. Djokovic left CAA in 2012.
He also coached Marat Safin.
The Israel-born Naor played professionally from 1985 to 1991. He reached a career high in singles of No. 245 in 1987 although he won just three matches at the ATP Tour level. Five of his six ATP Tournament appearances came at the now-defunct ATP event in Tel Aviv, Israel.
The CAA tennis division is small, and Naor’s clients reportedly make up the bulk of its revenue.
Raonic’s countrywoman, Genie Bouchard, also joined the CAA stable this spring, after stints with Lagardère, IMG and other agencies. She is represented by Matthew Fawcett.
TORONTO – Some of the players were preparing for the qualifying. But most of the players practicing in the late afternoon on Friday were still a few days away from their first-round matches in the main draw.
Diego Schwartzman (The No. 11 seed, who plays unseeded Kyle Edmund) and David Ferrer (who plays a qualifier or special exempt) took the court together.
Dominic Thiem (Bye, then Tsitsipas or Dzumhur) was on the stadium court. While Pierre-Hugues Herbert (the No. 7 seed in the qualifying, vs. Hubert Hurkacz) practiced with doubles partner Nicolas Mahut (No. 12 Tim Smyczek).
Félix Auger-Aliassime had a hit with Grigor Dimitrov, then stayed behind to hit some more serves.
Also on court was Marco Cecchinato, who will face Frances Tiafoe in the first round of the main draw.
Vasek Pospisil practiced with coach Rainer Schuettler. The Canadian wild card drew Borna Coric in the first round. Not an easy task under any circumstances. But Coric has already been here so long, he practically has stock in the place.
PARIS – The applause kept coming for Rafael Nadal, on the occasion of his unthinkable 11th French Open title Sunday.
It came in waves. And it wouldn’t stop.
The man himself stood on the court he has made his own. And he didn’t know what else to do but nod, and wave, and smile.
And then the tears came.
“For me, I don’t have words to describe the motions I felt at that moment. Something exceptional for me to find myself on that court,” Nadal said later, in one of his endless television interviews. “Nowhere else do I feel this.”
But perhaps the love of the French partisans finally came with this one – La Undécima.
The Austrian Dominic Thiem was vanquished, 6-4, 6-3, 6-2. And as he put it, winning at Roland Garros 11 times is one of the most outstanding things that has ever been achieved in sport.
And yet, if Nadal had conquered the tournament, he had never quite conquered the French.
The French stingy with the love
It has always been somewhat surprising, because the Mallorcan has been unwavering in his devotion to the city, its fans, the tournament and everyone associated with it.
“Since the first time that I came here until today is a love story with this event, not only with the victories, but this is all about the people who is working the event, too. I feel very close to all of them,” Nadal said in his press conference later in the evening.
With the passing of time, he even has spoken more and more in la langue de Molière in post-match interviews.
Perhaps it was because he kept winning it, taking much of the suspense out of the fortnight.
Perhaps Paris is more Roger Federer territory, a place reluctant to embrace a kid from a small town on a small Spanish island.
We certainly know they prefer their tennis more … artistic? Although art is in the eye of the beholder.
Nadal won’t have forgotten the emotions he felt back in 2009, when Robin Soderling defeated him and the crowd was firmly on the Swede’s side.
“They say it themselves and it’s true, the Parisian crowd is pretty stupid. I think the French don’t like it when a Spaniard wins,” Nadal’s uncle and former coach Toni Nadal said at the time. “Wanting someone to lose is a slightly conceited way of amusing yourself. They show the stupidity of people who think themselves superior.”
Nadal has never actively sought their love, but he has unequivocally deserved it.
On Sunday, he felt it – maybe really and truly for the first time.
Perhaps that’s why he hugged the Coupe des Mousquetaires a little more tightly this time, as if he never wanted to let it go.
He did say later that the emotions weren’t necessarily stronger than they were a year ago.
“Last year was very, very important. It had been awhile I hadn’t been winning when I got here last year,” Nadal said. “I feel like each year, it’s tougher to win it. Because the years are passing. I’m 32 now.”
Suspense – but not about the outcome
This was the first time Nadal had met a much-younger opponent in the French Open final.
And Thiem was a worthy foil, arguably the second-best clay-court player on the planet. It’s clear Nadal sees him as his successor, and considers him a good friend as well.
So there was a different dynamic to the quest for undécima, a faint hope for a changing of the guard – or at the very least, a compelling final.
Thiem, after all, had beaten Nadal three of the seven times they had played somewhere other than Paris.
But in Paris, in two attempts, he had failed to win a set.
In this third attempt, Thiem also failed to win a set.
Lucky with the weather
The biggest suspense on the day concerned whether the weather would cooperate. Rain and a thunderstorm were nearly guaranteed to hit the 16th arrondissement somewhere in the late afternoon or evening.
For nearly three weeks, through the qualifying and the main draw, this had been a possibility. But somehow, with only a couple of exceptions, the showers circumnavigated Roland Garros and allowed the tournament to proceed more or less on schedule.
Not 45 minutes after all the festivities were concluded, the wind picked up. And the thunder bellowed. And then the rain fell.
A worrisome moment
As Nadal was serving up a break in the third set at 2-1, at 30-love on his serve, he suddenly bolted to his chair after missing his first serve.
He was grabbing the middle finger on his left hand. And he looked really concerned.
The doctor and trainer immediately came out, as Nadal ripped off the tight wrap around his wrist that he said was to keep the sweat away from his racket hand. (He had it on the right wrist as well).
He stretched out the finger. And the physio massaged his forearm arm, up past the wrist, to get some blood flowing back into the finger.
Nadal finally returned to the service line for his second serve – and double-faulted.
But if the finger bothered him, it didn’t show.
Thiem didn’t win another game.
“Sort of a cramp”
“I had sort of cramp in the finger, and I couldn’t move it, and I was worried. I told myself I could have wasted all that energy if I couldn’t continue,” Nadal said to FranceTV. “The finger wouldn’t move. I couldn’t hold the racquet. So of course I was worried.”
Until then – and even after that – Nadal was in pure beast mode.
As much time as Nadal was taking between points, Thiem probably wasn’t objecting. So many of the points ended up with the Austrian fighting for oxygen.
If the point was short, Thiem was there with Nadal. If the point was very long, he stood his ground. But on the points between four and nine shots, Nadal was the master.
The Austrian hit the ball as hard as he possibly could. But it still came back. And the moment he didn’t, Nadal finished it off.
“I did the best that I could, but there’s a reason why Rafa won here 11 times. He’s obviously the toughest challenge in tennis, and he showed it once again. I didn’t play that bad. I was fighting for every ball, but he was just too good. So I have to accept it,” Thiem said.
“To me, it’s still been two great weeks. I still remember when you won here for the first time in 2005 I was 11 years old, watching on the TV. And honestly I never expected one day that I would play the finals here, so I’m really happy,” he said to Nadal during the trophy ceremony.
“I lost the final in the in the juniors seven years ago, and I lost the final today, I hope I will have another chance, maybe against you, that would be a dream.”
For Dominic Thiem, it was a superb victory to kickstart his all-important clay-court campaign.
For Novak Djokovic, it was – even in defeat – a building block in his renaissance.
Thiem prevailed 6-7 (2), 6-2, 6-3 in a third-round match in Monte Carlo Thursday that ran a few seconds short of 2 1/2 hours. It provided moments of great (and some no-so-great) tennis, and plenty of competitive tension and emotion.
Thiem was off for five weeks tending to a bone bruise in his foot. For a player often accused of playing far too much tennis as it is, it was an unusual layoff.
The break may serve him well in the late stages of the season. But it created some ring rust for this clay-court opener.
It took the 24-year-old two hours, 40 minutes to squeak past Russia’s Andrey Rublev in his first match. But he played a far, far better match against Djokovic, who won their first career five meetings before losing their most recent clash, a year ago at the French Open.
The reward for getting through this one is a date with No. 1 seed Rafael Nadal in the quarterfinals Friday.
Thiem’s tactics effective
Thiem’s serving patterns Thursday were designed to pull Djokovic out wide, on both sides of the court. Along with the changes in spin and velocity, they proved effective. The Austrian won 75 per cent of points of his first serves. He won 52 per cent of them on his second delivery. And he faced only three break points.
Again, he drew Djokovic into the backhand cross-court pattern that often proved a winning formula for Borna Coric in the previous round. The difference was that Coric is not as good a player, and he couldn’t do it often enough – or at the crucial moments late in the sets – to have a better outcome.
It’s a pattern that isn’t working as well for Djokovic these days because he isn’t confident enough in his ball striking to include the element that so often turns those exchanges in his favour. The ability to change the direction of the ball almost on command and fire his backhand down the line, thus gaining the advantage in the rally at any moment – is a cornerstone of his ground game.
In this one, while the two were close to even in the short rallies (under five shots), Thiem was well ahead between 5-9 shots (37-31) and longer than nine shots (17-10).
The Serb’s backhand is producing an alarmingly high number of errors at the moment (the majority of them going into the net on Thrusday). It was flagrant during his matches at Indian Wells and Miami, and it was just as apparent on Thursday. Of his 40 unforced errors (to only 20 winners), 26 came on the backhand side.
And when he did go down the line, he did so with such safety that, on the slower surface, Thiem was generally able to track it down.
Building blocks in Monte Carlo
Djokovic’s first match was an ideal matchup for him, against a countryman who was unlikely to mount enough resistance either mentally or with his game. He couldn’t have asked for better.
The match against Coric was a sterner test against a stronger opponent. It could have turned differently, had the 21-year-old Croat been able to push through on some of his opportunities. But that’s only one side of the net. On his side, Djokovic was faced with multiple challenges. And he resisted in a way he hadn’t during the American hard-court swing.
He needed more than 27 minutes, from his first match point through to his 10th and final match point, to close it out against Coric. Had the match gone to a third set – and it well could have – there’s no telling what the outcome might have been.
But it didn’t. And that experienced served him well, at times, on Friday.
And the fact that Djokovic was able to come back from 2-5, and three set points, to eke out the first set in a tiebreak was a huge positive.
Against Thiem, he defended the corners of the court a whole lot more effectively than he had the previous day. The uptick in his anticipation and side-to-side movement was noticeable.
“A lot of positives in this tournament. Three matches played. The last two matches have been almost two and a half hours, today three sets obviously against one of the best players in the world, especially on clay,” Djokovic told the media in Monte Carlo afterwards.
“I’ve played some great tennis… Still some ups and downs. But every match here in Monte-Carlo had some periods of brilliance and the tennis that I really enjoyed, I wanted to play. That obviously gives me a lot of positive energy for what’s coming up.”
Soft warning a turning point
Djokovic was visibly annoyed, at 3-2 in the third set, when chair umpire Carlos Bernardes gave him a soft warning, telling him to watch the time between points.
It was hardly an unusual occurrence in a Djokovic match.
And it came as the two players were on serve in the third set. It didn’t come just before Djokovic was about to serve. And Bernardes didn’t even issue a warning or a code violation.
Djokovic responded by taking an average of 16 seconds between points in his next game – down a full nine seconds from his 25-second average through the match to that point. And he was broken.
In his next service game, at 3-5 and working to stay in the match, Djokovic was still rushing. On one point, at 15-30, he fired his first serve as Bernardes was still addressing the crowd, asking them to quiet down.
Djokovic missed by several feet. He only salvaged that point with an off-the-charts difficult backhand volley on a rare (and curiously-timed) serve-and-volley on his second serve. It was not lucid thinking.
A few points later, it was over.
Djokovic declined to shake Bernardes’s hand even though, in truth, he had only himself to blame for failing to handle the fairly benign situation with his typical, experienced calm.
Back-to-back tough ones
But those are things that happen when your confidence is down.
There were long stretches of the match when Djokovic played with the fire and emotion that he needs to play his best.
But in those last three games, after that initial break of serve, the emotional energy seemed to drain out of him even though the match was by no means over.
The combination of that, and the back-to-back long, physical matches after a long spell without much match play, may have done him in a little.
But getting those matches – and some victories – will only serve him well going forward.
More clay next week
After the match, Djokovic told the media in Monte Carlo that he plans to add a tournament next week. He also said that he would continue to work with longtime coach Marian Vadja through the clay-court season.
Vadja left as part of a purge of the entirety of Team Djokovic before last year’s French Open. But he returned to help Djokovic through his clay-court preparation period in Spain.
“I’m lacking matches. That’s why we all agreed that it’s quite important for me to play, try to use every opportunity possible,” Djokovic said. “We’ll continue working hard in this process, trying to build up… I look forward to building more confidence on the court, to get my game on a desired level.”
The options are the 500-level event in Barcelona and a smaller, 250-level event in Budapest.
No doubt either would happily offer a wild card.
But his best play would be the smaller event.
(UPDATE: Djokovic chose Barcelona)
Budapest the better bet
Five of the eight Monte Carlo quarterfinalists – including Nadal and Thiem – are in the Barcelona draw. Lucas Pouille (at No. 11) is the only top-25 player in the Budapest draw barring last-minute surprises.
Budapest offers a first-round bye in a 28-player draw, compared to a first-round bye in a 56-player draw, with an extra round. That means an extra day or two of practice. It could also mean a better opportunity to continue to build on the groundwork laid in Monte Carlo – perhaps even the opportunity to hold up a trophy for the first time since Eastbourne last summer.
(Not to mention, it would be a welcome boost for a 250-level tournament, something the smaller events desperately need in the top-heavy world of men’s tennis).
With two more Masters 1000 tournaments in Madrid and Rome before the French Open, there remain plenty of opportunities to face the top guns. The more matches under the belt when that happens, the better.
Pretty much everything Roger Federer touches turns to gold.
So why anyone would have any doubt that the first edition of the Laver Cup would be anything but a smash?
It was, on every level, a huge success. Sellout crowds, high-quality tennis, plenty of drama and emotion, a bulletproof format … and Roger and Rafa.
It was a such a perfect storm that even the absence of many top players turned out to be a plus.
Team World (Team America, really) ended up a young squad of millennials – both real and throwback. They decided to have their own private party in front of 14,000 people inside the O2 Arena, and millions more around the world.
“They had the better chants and the better moves, but in the end, Team Europe got it done,” said Laver Cup maestro Roger Federer, who pretty much notices everything and has a uniquely passive-aggressive way of letting you know.
Team World wins the “Team Fun” award
Outmatched on the court for the most part, Team World won the fun contest
The contrast between Team World and Team Europe couldn’t have been more stark.
Obviously most of the older players were on Team Europe. At times during the weekend you almost got the sense they were exchanging stock tips while Team World recreated The Floor is Lava, this summer’s trending challenge on YouTube.
Just keeping track of Frances Tiafoe’s ever-changing head gear was a trending challenge in itself. Veterans John Isner and Sam Querrey were young again. And green rookie Denis Shapovalov got more corrupted by the day. He may never be the same.
But by the very end, the last 20 minutes of the Roger Federer match, Team World stepped it up – led by an emotional and demonstrative Rafael Nadal.
The “black” court turned out to play dark gray on television. And it immediately became a visual that will always be associated exclusively with the Laver Cup.
The ball stood out on the stark backdrop for television viewers. But the blue and red lighting around the court and in the stands prevented it from being too drab.
As well, the stark white of the high-end sponsors also stood out. Don’t think that wasn’t a huge factor as well.
They really did think of everything. One complaint fans often have when watching tennis on television is that the radar gun that measures the serves is hard to find, and often hard to see. In this setup, the numbers were big and bright and always easy to find.
The stage where the rest of the teammates cheered was also perfectly set up. The fans could access both teams during changeovers (and even during the matches) for autographs. But if the players wanted to leave the court – especially the losers – they could do so in a straight line towards the locker room. If they didn’t want to deal with the autograph seekers, they didn’t have to.
At the WTA Tour Finals in Singapore and to a large extent at the ATP Tour Finals in London, the fans are often in the dark as the court is lit up. It makes for a bit of an isolated atmosphere although it does hide any empty seats. At the Laver Cup, the stands were lit in a way that fit in perfectly with the court. But it also allowed you to see the fans.
It was pitch-perfect. It almost didn’t even look real.
Next-Gen graphics, camera angles
A company based in Sydney, Australia and Los Angeles called Girraphic was the mastermind behind the graphics, which were unlike most of what you see all season long.
They were spectacular, especially the ones superimposed on the net.
Great variety of camera angles
The camera angles were also varied. The baseline cam (affectionately referred to as the “butt cam” because they often close in on the derrière of the player returning serve) has been used before. But rarely this often.
They also had an improved version of the net cam; Bob Feller, the legendary ESPN tennis producer, says, “stay tuned”.
It's a great look… Not the first time it's been used but better camera. Stay tuned ..
Federer annihilated it at one stage, which was amusing. They had a fish-eye lens at the net that showed the entire court in a new way. There were slow-motion replays of emotional moments and Team Fun routines. It was frantic, but it didn’t feel that way.
Having the coaches on court – and the players playing coaches as well – made for far more interesting cutaways than you’ll see at a regular tournament. There, the endless go-tos are countless shots of Mirka Federer biting her lip, or Jelena Djokovic looking like she might lose her stuff at any moment, get old quickly.
They had to dim the microphones at times, given some of the cussing by Team World. (There were no such issues for Team Europe; captain Bjorn Borg said more during his trophy ceremony speech than he said on court for three days).
Trying too hard
For whatever reason, the braintrust behind the Laver Cup decided that the word “exhibition” was a bad word.
It was clear that a talking point went out to everyone to emphasize that it wasn’t an exhibition. That it didn’t feel like an exhibition. And that it meant something to these guys. They were devoted in their dedication to bringing home the Laver cup to their (country? continent? world section?). And that it meant the world to them.
The thing is, why is the word “exhibition” by definition a bad word?
That’s exactly what this was. Perhaps out of this, a new category somewhere between tournament and exhibition called “special event” may be created.
But they tried so hard. Way too hard.
It’s worth remembering that every single person trying to convince you the Laver Cup “wasn’t an exhibition” had a financial stake in the event. The players received a ton of money up front (and an additional $250,000 each for winning). Federer’s management company, Team 8, for which he is the biggest earner, made a major investment.
Everyone from the chair umpire to the all-star cast of commentators and analysts took home a nice additional paycheque for their participation. It was to the point where the commentators were making excuses for some salty language on Team World’s side with platitudes like “It just absolutely shows how much these guys want to win for Europe and the world.”
Actually, it just showed that they use profanity. As many of us do on a tennis court. As they do during the regular Tour events as well. But they’re not used to being amongst a gaggle of buddies on a tennis court with the microphones on.
Giving the players (and captain) such a pass would only happen in an exhibition. In many ways, the vibe on that level was much as it was for that first, money-heavy season of IPTL. Which was, of course, much derided as “merely an exhibition.”
Format on point
The very nature of the team format was going to make for great competition.
In a standard exhibition, where two top players fly in and out of a city for a one-nighter, they’re playing for themselves and the crowd.
Regardless of the circumstances, if you play against two of the greatest of all time, you’re going to go all out. And if you are one of the greatest of all time, you didn’t get there by not taking it seriously every time you step on the court.
The place was packed. Everyone had fun. Everyone came out a winner. The fans loved it. Everyone made lots of money.
There is no downside, and little need to preach semantics.
The stated intention to honour the champions of the past in naming the event after Rod Laver, and having Bjorn Borg and John McEnroe as captains (neatly dovetailing with the opening of the movie based on their rivalry) put a nice, sincere veneer on what is very much a money-making enterprise.
The well-heeled crowd in Prague was enthusiastic but extremely civilized. It was only in the waning moments that they began to do those things the diehard fans hate, like cheering for missed first serves.
The crowd in Chicago will be quite different.
The makeup of “Team World” also will be quite different.
What a perfect world it would be if this year’s cast were playing “at home” in Chicago. Their act would play even better. And imagine, conversely, that players such as Nishikori, Murray, Raonic, Anderson and del Potro had been on “Team World” instead of Shapovalov, Kyrgios, Tiafoe, Isner and Sock.
Team Fun probably a one-off
The atmosphere would have been completely different – not nearly as lively. And John McEnroe, as captain, wouldn’t have had nearly the same positive impact. That’s going to be impossible to recreate next year.
What if, next year, Federer and Nadal aren’t blessed with the same health and good form they’ve enjoyed this year, their renaissance year? It’s inarguable that these two are definitely on a year-to-year basis, at this stage.
Without them, it’s not the same event. It’s arguably barely a top-flight event, despite the illustrious resumés of the other player options. In the special-event solar system, star power counts exponentially.
It’s also worth noting here that Djokovic, Murray and Nishikori had not committed to the Laver Cup before their injury woes. Will that change now that they’ve seen it work so amazingly well? It might. It might not.
Federer and Nadal transcend borders. The others, not nearly to the same extent. You know Federer is committed as long as he’s healthy, given his business ties. Countryman Stan Wawrinka likely would do him a solid. But did Nadal just do a one-off favour for his frenemy? We’ll find out.
They should also consider shortening the time between matches. It could run a half hour or more. We realize the need to sell merchandise and adult beverages. But with only one match to talk about, the commentators had a tough time filling. And it’s easy to lose your audience these days.
Overtly or not, this event has been positioned as a potential alternative format to the century-old Davis Cup competition. That’s partly because of the weekend team format. And it’s also because of the fact that Nadal and Federer played it while skipping representing their country this year.
No doubt there are plenty of secret board meetings over at ITF headquarters. And the drama is made even more real by the fact that the USTA and Tennis Australia – two federations that run Grand Slam tournaments under the ITF umbrella – are involved in a major way. At the very least, the huge money the players were paid just to show up dwarfs the relative pittance they earn for representing their country – with far fewer weeks’ commitment.
But the effects go beyond that, right to the heart of the Tour that made all these players rich and famous.
There were two 250-level ATP Tour events the week of the Laver Cup – Metz and St. Petersburg, Russia. There are two 250-level events in faraway China this week that brush up against the end of the event, Shenzhen and Chengdu.
Stars needed at the 250s
It’s no secret that the 250-level tournaments are struggling to varying degrees. The only way they can make a good go of it is if they can attract a big name to play in the event. That draws the fans; more crucially, it also draws corporate sponsorship.
Metz and St. Petersburg were out of luck. (There was a story reporting that Djokovic had committed to the St. Petersburg tournament before he shut down his season). Tomas Berdych, who would have been the No. 3 seed in Shenzhen, pulled out before the event began. (Why he even entered it, knowing as far back as February when he was doing Laver Cup promotion in Prague with Federer that he’d likely play, is a question for him).
Tiafoe also withdrew from Shenzhen. He’s a crowd-pleaser. But it also cost him a chance to earn some ranking points which, at this stage of his career, he still needs. Denis Shapovalov had committed to a big Challenger in France this week. He only played on the Laver Cup’s opening day; he pulled out of Orléans that very day. That’s late in the game.
Tired, jet-lagged top seeds
Alexander Zverev and Dominic Thiem, the No. 1 seeds in Shenzhen and Chengdu, respectively, remain on board so far. But they’ll arrive in Asia very late, after a very long trip. And they’ve both signed on for doubles, as well.
They’ll be jet-lagged – and perhaps even a little hungover from the post-victory celebrations. They won’t have given themselves the best chance to win. That does them a disservice. And it also hurts the tournaments that no doubt paid them handsome appearance fees, as top-10 players, to show up.
And who knows if any other Laver Cup participants might have considered playing?
In the end, the Laver Cup seems to be here to stay. As well it should; it was all kinds of fun and, no doubt, quite profitable for all.
It’s only an exhibition. But it combines the best elements of everything tennis has to offer right now. It needs to stay.
What remains to be worked out is how it best can fit into the overall tennis landscape. Because it needs to fit. The alphabet soup of competing tennis factions all need to figure out a way to make that happen.
NEW YORK – He’d been suffering from a virus for 48 hours, had a stye in his eye and generally looked so gray and ashen you figured he might not even go the distance.
But Juan Martin del Potro is a tennis player. And unless they risk further injury by carrying on, tennis players usually play on.
Because you never know what can happen.
The 2009 champion somehow, improbably, and with some help from opponent Dominic Thiem, came back from two sets to none down to pull off a 1-6, 2-6, 7-6 (1), 6-1, 6-4 victory Monday to reach the US Open quarterfinals.
He saved two match points along the way, with two monster serves.
Del Potro will face five-time champion Roger Federer on Wednesday.
Del Potro said he was seriously considering retiring in the middle of the second set, not even an hour in. He said the crowd support – the Grandstand was full to bursting and with buzz to burn – inspired him to hang in there.
“It was very important because I was trying to retire the match in the second set. Then I saw the crowd waiting for more tennis, waiting for my good forehands, good serves. I took all that energy to change in a good way and think about fight and not retire,” he said afterwards. “And I did well, and I start to enjoy little bit more about the fans. I think I did everything well after the third set. The crowd enjoy with me all points. It was unbelievable atmosphere.”
At first, the Grandstand – only the third-biggest court on the grounds – seemed somewhat disrespectful to the only former champion in the lineup other than Nadal and Roger Federer.
It was the only one of the eight men’s and women’s singles matches being played Monday that wasn’t either on Arthur Ashe Stadium (five) or Louis Armstrong Stadium (two).
But it turned out to be a perfect arena for a dramatic comeback.
“I couldn’t breathe, I couldn’t move well. Dominic was dominating the match so easy. But then when we start the third set, I broke his serve very quick, and then I won the set in 20 minutes. Then the history change a lot,” del Potro said. “I starting to see the crowd. I took all the energy from the fans. That’s what I did in the end, just keep fighting. I don’t give up any points from the third until the fifth set. I was ready to win the match in that moment.”
Any comeback takes some cooperation. And Thiem did his bit. As mature and masterful as he can look when he’s winning, that’s how young he can sometimes still look when faced with a surging opponent or a tight situation.
The match ended on a double fault, which probably sums up Thiem’s day.
Next up, the 2009 rematch
Del Potro’s issues weren’t injury-related, which is welcome news for the next step. He’ll have more two days to recover from whatever virus he was wrestling with. So you’d have to expect he’ll be feeling a whole lot better when he takes the court against Federer in a rematch of that 2009 US Open final.
As Federer was dispatching Philipp Kohlschreiber in straight sets nearby, inside cavernous Arthur Ashe Stadium, he could hear the roars from the nearby Grandstand. “That’s the first time I experienced that. Clearly Grandstand wasn’t where it used to be. But, I mean, they had epic crowds,” Federer said.
“He’s a good guy. I know him well. But when he was hurt, clearly I didn’t see him for a long time. I was sorry for him because I think he had a legitimate good chance to become world No. 1 at that time. Him and (Nikolay) Davydenko, actually both of them got hurt at the wrong times in their careers. Both had a chance to go for world No. 1 at that time. ’09, I think it was,” Federer added. “So I’m really happy for him. It’s a good match to look forward to. Reminds me clearly of the 2009 finals that we had, which was an epic, too. I hope we can produce another good one.”
Federer was a combined 39-0 against his last three opponents at this US Open, and he kept those perfect head-to-heads intact.
Twice, the Argentine beat Federer at his hometown tournament in Basel, Switzerland (2012 and 2013). He defeated him at the ATP Tour Finals twice as well. And in that 2009 US Open final when Federer was going for a sixth consecutive title. Notably, Federer hasn’t won here since.
“The greatest guy on the history”
“I admire him, too. Everybody loves him. Is going to be interesting match for play. It will be after eight years again in the central court of this tournament. I know how to play if I want to win, but I will see how physically I feel after this battle,” del Potro said. “But always is a pleasure to play the greatest guy on the history.”
Federer’s crowd advantage is significant against nearly every opponent he plays – even against Andy Murray at Wimbledon, the crowd is somewhat torn. But in del Potro, he will run up against an opponent who will have plenty of support of his own.
He won the event, which always helps. But there’s a huge Spanish-speaking and Argentine population in New York. You could see and hear some of them going out of their DelPo-lovin’ minds during the match against Thiem.
But they’re not alone. There’s something about the gentle giant that just engenders a lot of love and devotion. Perhaps it’s the stark contrast between his hulking physicality and his gentle demeanour. Maybe it’s his journey.
“I don’t know. I think the people loves my effort to come back and play tennis. They know what have been through with all my wrist problems. They like one guy who never give ups, and he’s trying to play tennis,” del Potro said. “You can see my backhand is not good enough yet, but I’m still trying. I think the people likes that.”
NEW YORK – A marathon, 87-match singles spree caught up on Tuesday’s rainout, so the US Open is back to normal. At least for a few days.
And on Day 4, it’s Rafa and Roger time, as both play their second-round matches.
Whether they’ll rotate day and night session on Arthur Ashe for as long as both are in the tournament is too soon to predict.
But Federer has the late-afternoon slot against Russian veteran Mikhail Youzhny. And Nadal has the late-night session against New York-born Japanese player Taro Daniel.
Neither figures to struggle. But you never know.
The men’s and women’s doubles, as well as the mixed doubles, also get under way today. The doubles might have begun Wednesday but for the catchup on the singles side. So the schedule is full.
Some of the players who playd their first rounds Wednesday will have to play again today. On the men’s side, with the best-of-five, that’s more of a factor.
Among those players are Juan Martin del Potro, David Goffin, Grigor Dimitrov and Gaël Monfils.
Women’s Matches to Watch
 Jelena Ostapenko (LAT) vs. Sorana Cirstea (ROU)
Ostapenko has generally been fairly quiet out there since her surprise win at the French Open. Although she did have a decent run at Wimbledon. But her North American summer hasn’t amounted to much.
Cirstea should not be an unsurmountable obstacle. But you never know. On the plus side, upsets have meant that there isn’t a single seeded player potentially in Ostapenko’s way until the quarterfinals. So watch out.
Cirstea crushed qualifier Lesley Kerkhove in the first round, despite a rather comprehensive (and unusual) tape job on her right arm in practice leading up to it.
Yanina Wickmayer (BEL) vs. [Q] Kaia Kanepi (EST)
This is a matchup between two former top-15 players, who have fallen on more difficult times.
The 27-year-old Wickmayer, currently at No. 129, was No. 12 in the world when she was 20. Kanepi, who has struggled with Guillain-Barré syndrome and mononucleosis the last few years, was ranked No. 15 just five years ago, after a (relatively) late surge up the rankings.
She’s currently at No. 419. And she had to use a protected ranking just to get into the qualifying.
It’s a great opportunity for both.
Daria Kasatkina (RUS) vs. Christina Mchale (USA)
Kasatkina, still 19, had a great run this past April in winning the Har-Tru event in Charleston. But since then, she has struggled, no doubt in part because of an ankle injury. She lost first round in Stuttgart, Madrid and Rome (there can always be a hangover exhaustion effect after a young player does such a big thing, and hers lasted the clay-court tuneup season).
She didn’t play between the French Open and Wimbledon, and hasn’t won back-to-back matches since.
As for McHale, she’s 25 now. And it’s been five years since she broke into the top 25 right around this time. She’s ranked No. 63 and it might be time for a good result, so close to where she grew up.
Men’s Matches to Watch
 Dominic Thiem (AUT) vs. [WC] Taylor Fritz (USA)
The new father has his entire extended family with him in New York, and the group effort was effective in a comprehensive first-round win over veteran Marcos Baghdatis.
Thiem is a different customer. And though he’s not renowned for his hard-court efforts, he had no trouble at all in dismissing another wid card, Aussie Alex de Minaur, over two days to reach the second round.
 Feliciano Lopez (ESP) vs. Fernando Verdasco (ESP)
Former doubles partners, friends and longtime foes, the two veteran Spaniards meet again on, as it happens, Court 13.
Both lefties, they go at it in completely different ways as Verdasco is a fairly stubborn baseliner, while Lopez is much more of an all-court attacker in a very non-Spanish way.
Superficially, this is also a highly attractive matchup. But you didn’t read that here.
 Grigor Dimitrov (BUL) vs. Andrey Rublev (RUS)
Rublev is one of the less-heralded young guns. But he’s on his way just the same.
He’s left to carry the torch for the 4 Slam tennis academy as his countryman and training partner Karen Khachanov was upset in the first round. And he’ll bring plenty of fire to this match against Dimitrov.
If Dimitrov were in the bottom half of the draw and not the top, you’d give him a ghost of a chance on a deep run in this tournament. As it is, most likely will make his seeding and get to the quarterfinals. But he has to get through Rublev first. And that’s easier said than done.
ROLAND GARROS – Milos Raonic, the No. 5 seed at the French Open, played spoilsport in what turned out to be a true-to-form final eight.
The Canadian was upset, 8-6 in the fifth set after four hours and 17 minutes, by No. 20 seed Pablo Carreño Busta in the fourth round on Sunday.
But the other seven top seeds made it. And along with Carreño Busta, they make up a top-quality, if predictable, elite eight bracket.
Which is not to say that they all arrived here in thoroughly predictable fashion.
Here’s a look at their twists and turns through the first week of the tournament.
No. 1 – Andy Murray
The top seed went about it all bass-ackwards. He lost sets to players he probably shouldn’t have (Andrey Kuznetsov, Martin Klizan) and didn’t lose sets to players he maybe could have (Juan Martin del Potro, the powerful Russian Karen Khachanov).
But along the way the Brit appeared to rebuild some of the confidence lost along the way this season – just in time for the pointy end of the tournament.
Much was made of the new face in Team Nole, as Andre Agassi arrived with great fanfare shortly before the tournament began.
Agassi is reportedly gone now, but promises to be back when and if Djokovic needs him. While he was here, he watched Djokovic navigate some pretty good players routinely. Except for Diego Schwartzman.
The Argentine was right in there until his body failed him in the late going of their five-setter in the third round. He even led two sets to one. With Djokovic’s up-and-down results this season, it would have been an unlikely upset, but by no means an impossible one.
Whether his earlier rounds – he had, by most measures, a good draw – were enough preparation for what his quarter-final opponent will bring to the table is a question that will be answered on Court Suzanne Lenglen Tuesday.
Fitness for battle: 8
Quarter-final opponent:  Dominic Thiem
No. 3 – Stan Wawrinka
The only big (Swiss) cheese in the draw this year with the absence of Roger Federer, Wawrinka’s season has been below his standards. But while it’s a cliché to say a player peaks for the Grand Slams, the 32-year-old REALLY peaks for the Slams. Which probably is why he’s won three of them, including this one.
Wawrinka faced two of the more dangerous lower seeds in the tournament in Fabio Fognini and Gaël Monfils, and got through both in straight sets. Again with Fognini, the body didn’t cooperate.
Against Monfils on Monday, everyone was hoping for a blockbuster. But these two good friends made it more like a fun match for beers in their local Swiss public park.
When it was over, Wawrinka looked as though he almost felt badly that Monfils couldn’t put up more resistance. He knows more than most that his great friend, at 30 but with a fragile body, won’t have many more chances to make a deep run at his home-country Slam.
“It was a mentally exhausting match, I think. We were both tense. And we know each other so well. We knew how important it was, for him or for me, to play well,” Wawrinka said.
On the worrisome side, the Swiss star’s back locked up from the beginning of the match. It’s what he calls the most fragile part of his body, always managed but never worry-free.
Fitness for battle: 7
Quarter-final opponent:  Marin Cilic
No. 4 – Rafael Nadal
It appeared the nine-time French Open champion was back for real in 2017 after a great start to the season. But who knew to what extent?
His French Open prep was vintage, although stubbornly deciding to play Rome despite already having won three titles looked like a bad call when he was on fumes by the quarterfinals. He lost to Dominic Thiem there, after beating him twice earlier in the clay-court season.
Raonic, slotted to be his quarter-final opponent, might have posed a few more challenges than Nadal’s young countryman Carreño Busta. Nadal is pretty much money when he’s playing fellow Spaniards. And Carreño Busta is coming off a draining, emotional marathon win while Nadal is fresh as a margarita amarilla.
Fitness for battle: 11
Quarter-final opponent:  Pablo Carreño Busta
No. 6 – Dominic Thiem
With his efforts during the spring clay season, and with fellow youngster Alexander Zverev winning Rome, it figured these two would be in the mix in the second week in Paris.
But Zverev flamed out in the first round against Fernando Verdasco. And so it was left to Thiem to make his seed. He did so very much under the radar, without dropping a set and ceding more than four games in only two of the 12 sets he played.
Had he faced David Goffin in the fourth round, rather than Horacio Zeballos, Thiem might have been tested more. But Goffin’s nasty ankle injury, suffered in the first set against Zeballos, took him out.
In the quarter-finals, we’ll find out if he has a Plan B, after getting just one game against Novak Djokovic in the Rome semi-final a few weeks ago. On the plus side, he won’t have to play him the day after he has to play Nadal.
Fitness for battle: 8
Quarter-final opponent:  Novak Djokovic
No. 7 – Marin Cilic
With Nadal, Djokovic and Thiem all in the final eight, no one is talking about Marin Cilic.
He’s used to that – especially in Paris, where he is a quarter-finalist for the first time in his career a year after losing in the first round, to No. 166-ranked Marco Trungelliti of Argentina.
Cilic has had a sweet draw, and hasn’t lost more than three games in any set. He caught a break in the fourth round Monday as opponent Kevin Anderson retired in the middle of the second set due to injury.
The last time Cilic faced Anderson was in the third round of the 2014 US Open. For what it’s worth, he won the tournament.
Fitness for battle: 7
Quarter-final opponent:  Stan Wawrinka
No. 8 – Kei Nishikori
In the third round, Nishikori caught a break when rain came to suspend his match with the younger, bigger, stronger Hyeon Chung of South Korea. When play resumed Sunday, Nishikori still looked dead on his feet, his stiff back – or something – limiting his movement to a major degree.
Somehow, he got through that one.
Then on Monday, he faced Fernando Verdasco and looked basically the same in losing the first set 6-0. Somehow, he warmed up the body parts and got through that one as well. Let’s face it, though, he got help from Verdasco.
This is kind of the story of Nishikori’s career; his inability to keep his body as strong as his will has held him back from … who knows what?
Fitness for battle: 3
Quarter-final opponent:  Andy Murray
And, finally, the outlier
No. 20 – Pablo Carreño Busta
No one gives the 25-year-old a shot against his much-decorated compatriot in the quarter-finals. Maybe not even the Carreño Busta family, for all we know.
The man himself said after his win over Raonic that if he didn’t think he had a shot, he wouldn’t take the court. He might get his behind kicked, he might pull off a miracle. But he can’t ask for more than playing the clay GOAT and his good friend on a big stadium court in the French Open quarter-finals.
Hopefully his family, who had to leave to catch a flight back to Spain in the third set of his match against Raonic, will fly back to see this one.
Fitness for battle: 5
Quarter-final opponent:  Rafael Nadal
Nadal vs. Carreño Busta is on Court Philippe Chatrier Tuesday, while Djokovic vs. Thiem is on Court Suzanne Lenglen. You have to think the champion is going to come out of that group.
Nishikori vs. Murray and Wawrinka vs. Cilic will be Wednesday, with far less fanfare.
It was certainly going to be difficult for Dominic Thiem to come back and play another one of the greatest ever, less than 24 hours after beating Rafael Nadal in straight sets.
Thiem handed the nine-time French Open champion his first defeat on clay this season. Novak Djokovic brought Thiem back down to earth with a resounding thud.
The Serbian, who turns 30 on Monday, brushed off the legitimate Thiem threat in just under an hour. The 6-1, 6-0 victory was comprehensive.
Thiem won just two of 13 points with his second serve, just 46 per cent with his first serve in suffering la baguette and le bagel.
Djokovic was screaming and roaring as though he was in his closest match of the season. There was fire in him that had not been seen in quite awhile. The tennis was to the same level.
“This is undoubtedly my best performance of this year and maybe even longer. I’m overjoyed and happy with every minute that I spent on the court today. It was a perfect match. Everything that I intended to do, I have done it and even more,” Djokovic told the media in Rome. “There’s not much to say except that I am so grateful to experience something like this, because I have been waiting and working for it for a long time.”
It was his second victory of the day. In the afternoon, Djokovic picked up his quarter-final match against Juan Martin del Potro at 6-1, 1-2 and finished off a 6-1, 6-4 victory.
What to take from it? Only good news for Djokovic, who found the fire and may well stoke it right through the fortnight in Paris.
For Thiem, it’s one he can turn the page on quickly. His victory over Nadal Friday might have been in straight sets, but it took nearly two hours. And when you wake up the next morning after playing Nadal, you feel it in a way you would against few other players.
Thiem went 12-4 during the French Open tuneup season, losing twice to Nadal and once to Djokovic. His work is done.
It seems that Djokovic’s work has truly just begun.
He will face No. 16 seed Alexander Zverev of Germany in the final. The 20-year-old and the world No. 2 will be facing each other for the first time.
“I’ve had a lot of tough matches in this tournament, I’ve had a lot of tough opponents. To be in the final here is amazing for me,” Zverev said after defeating surprise semifinalist John Isner of the U.S. 6-4, 6-7 (5), 6-1. “He served something like 78 per cent, so it’s not easy to break him. And I managed to do it three times.”
Zverev is the first German to reach a Masters 1000 final since Nicolas Kiefer played Nadal in Toronto at the 2008 Rogers Cup.
He is the youngest to reach a Masters 1000 final since a teenaged Djokovic won Miami in 2007.
After a sub-par start to the season, Djokovic currently stands at No. 16 in the race to the ATP Tour Finals in London. That’s an improvement over No. 23 the previous week. But if he wins Sunday, he’ll be up to No. 4 with a bullet. If he does, Zverev would be right behind him at No. 5.