Oz Open ’18 forecast: more sunny than wet


It was pouring in Melbourne on the day of the much-anticipated annual rite.

But Australian Open meteorologist Bob Leighton prognosticated that the weather during the 2018 Australian Open would be much better.

Of course, he says that every year. As he should.

Here’s Bob’s forecast:

“Early predictions show that the weather will be mostly sunny and fine during Australian Open 2018. Daily maximum temperatures for January are predicted to be around mid-20s, and there could be four or five days in the 30s, with the possibility of one to three days in the high 30s,” he said.

“There could be two or three days with some rainfall and a thunderstorm may be possible, but overall there will be more sunny days than wet ones.”

Accu-Weather’s long-term forecast doesn’t see those high 30s (Celsius) days in its future.


A weather-proof Slam

Rain isn’t really a problem at the Australian Open – at least not for the players ranked high enough to merit a spot on the schedule on one of the three arenas with retractable roofs: Rod Laver, Hisense and Margaret Court.

The same is true if the heat were to get intense. That hasn’t happen a whole lot in recent years, despite our common perception of the Australian summer weather. 

They will close the roofs if the temperature meets certain parameters. But if they do that, they also stop play on all the outside courts, because that means it’s pretty unbearable.

It happened one day during the 2014 edition – new Canadian Davis Cup captain Frank Dancevic’s star-turning moment.

When it gets bad – it gets really bad.

Last year, the average high during the tournament was 26°C (79°F) and there was an average of nine hours of sunshine a day.

The 2009 edition was the warmest on record. An absolute scorcher. The average daily high was nearly 95°F.

Djokovic vs. Mannarino postponed to Tuesday


WIMBLEDON – The fate of the eighth and final fourth-round men’s match on Manic Monday was a long time coming.

Would Novak Djokovic and Adrian Mannarino play on No. 1 Court, after the marathon between Rafael Nadal and Gilles Muller? And if so, how long could they play before darkness fell?

Would Djokovic and Mannarino be moved to Centre Court? The net was still up, the umpire’s chair still in place during Nadal vs. Muller.

Would Djokovic and Mannarino start on No. 1 court, then be moved to Centre Court to finish up? There was precedent for that.

But there was no news of any kind, as Nadal and Muller kept holding serve, and holding serve again until Muller finally completed the upset.

Information blackout

It seemed Djokovic might have an inkling about what was to happen.

Then again, surely he was keeping wife Jelena apprised, right?

In the end, Wimbledon cancelled the match. Officially, at 8:49 p.m.

And not only did that create more questions than it answered, it also will have a ripple effect on the women’s quarter-finals on Tuesday.

The reasoning was, well, considerate. But debatable. 

“The safety and security of all visitors to The Championships is of paramount importance. The preference was to play the Djokovic v Mannarino match as scheduled on No.1 Court.

When that was no longer an option, it was determined the match could not be moved to Centre Court due to the number of spectators remaining in the Grounds.

As late as 8.30pm, 30,000 people still remained in the Grounds, and therefore moving the match would have created a significant safety issue.

Both players were explained the rationale of postponing the match until tomorrow, which is now scheduled for a 12noon start on Centre Court.”

No stampedes at the AELTC

It’s worth noting that Wimbledon is a place that makes a friendly announcement over the public-address system shortly before the gates open at 10:30 a.m. There are thousands of people waiting outside to sprint for the court they plan to set up on for the day, and the announcer asks them not to run.

And they pretty much don’t ever run.

It’s a place where thousands of people camp out every night just to get inside the gates the next day, and it’s all quite peaceful. As well, it’s a place where fans line up forever to get into one show court or another, and we’ve never seen a contretemps.

It’s also worth noting that as popular as Novak Djokovic is, he’s not Andy Murray or Roger Federer in this particular context.

Does it seem as though Wimbledon – generally a well-oiled machine of the highest caliber – is having a few extra bumps this year?

And we don’t mean only the bumps (and divots) behind the Centre Court baseline that some players have been pointing out. 

Would they for Fed?

Djokovic never even got on court to hit the behind-the-back shot he was practicing early in the week. Now, his schedule, and that of opponent Adrian Mannarino, will get jammed. (Stephanie Myles/Tennis.Life)

It begs a legitimate question: had it been Murray or Federer on No. 1 Court waiting to play, would they have made the same decision?

The world No. 1 Brit, and Federer – the player many would have pulled heaven from earth to wrangle a ticket to No. 1 Court to see play Monday.

They probably won’t answer that question. Wimbledon makes its decisions – and they’re well thought out and reasoned per all of the parameters they have to deal with, even if people disagree with the outcome. And that’s that.

Wimbledon’s basic philosophy about the roof is that even though it is in place, Wimbledon is an outdoor tournament and, as much as possible, they try to keep it that way.

But if it suits them, they can be “flexible.”

Bouchard hits Centre Court

Last year, Genie Bouchard and Magdalena Rybarikova began their first-round match on Court 12 on the Tuesday, were delayed a full day but when persistent rain blew the schedule up, the tournament made the unusual decision of relocating the match to Centre Court to get it finished Wednesday night.

There were plenty of other deserving candidates. Why this match? It ended up being the only one to get finished while so many players waited out two solid days of rain.


The special treatment Genie Bouchard received during a rainy first week at Wimbledon last year had everything to do with the need to schedule second-round opponent Johanna Konta on Centre Court. (Stephanie Myles/Tennis.Life)

The reason became clear when Brit Johanna Konta got the one women’s slot on Centre Court for her second-round match the next day. She was playing the winner of the Bouchard-Rybarikova match and if that match hadn’t been completed when it was, there would have been no match.

And the more the schedule was pushed back, the harder it would have been to justify putting Konta (then only the No. 16 seed) on Centre when so many more accomplished players were waiting to play.

Frenchmen moved mid-match

In 2015, another unusual situation arose as Frenchmen Gilles Simon and Gaël Monfils were playing their third-round match on No. 1 Court on the first Saturday night, when darkness fell.

If they didn’t finish, they would have had to wait until Monday. And if they waited until Monday, the entire Manic Monday concept would have gone all wrong as the winner of that one could not play a second best-of-five singles match that same day.

Gilles Simon and Gaël Monfils found their No. 1 Court match moved to Centre Court on the first Saturday of the 2015 tournament.

So … they relocated the match to Centre Court.

Except, they didn’t announce it. The fans on No. 1 Court, who were only told play was being suspended because of bad light, didn’t know it was being moved. The majority of them went home, and were cheated out of a dénouement and even a chance to get onto Centre Court, if they never had before.

There ended up being, perhaps, 2,000 people on Centre Court as anyone who was still hanging around the site was allowed in.

The difference between that one and Monday’s confusion was that the club stated there were exponentially more people still on the grounds than there were for that Simon-Monfils match.

Tuesday forecast: grim

One parameter Wimbledon probably needed to factor in with this decision is that the forecast for Tuesday is … awful. The tournament got a little lucky Monday, with the possibility of showers and maybe even a thundershower forecast. They never materialized.

They won’t be as lucky on Tuesday.

The forecast for Tuesday at Wimbledon is for the wet stuff. Pretty much all day. Just to add to the intrigue. (Stephanie Myles/Tennis.Life)

Light rain through the morning and early afternoon, then it gets heavier later in the afternoon and into the evening.

Lunchtime with Mannarino

The Djokovic-Mannarino match was rescheduled to be first up on Centre Court Tuesday. And the usual start time of 1 p.m. was moved up to noon. The winner will have to play against on Wednesday, with the men’s quarter-finals scheduled to go that day.

What that means, practically, is that Venus Williams and Jelena Ostapenko, who had a firm 1 p.m. start time for their women’s quarter-final, must now sit and wait.

The men’s best-of-five set match could take two hours. It could take three. It could – as Nadal and Muller did Monday – take four hours and 47 minutes. Or someone could pull a hamstring in the second game of the match, and it could take 10 minutes.

Then comes the other quarter-final from the bottom half of the draw: No. 2 seed Simona Halep vs. No. 6 seed, Brit Johanna Konta.

Men’s postponement affects the women

Those three matches will be played. But what about the top half?

Svetlana Kuznetsova and Garbiñe Muguruza are set to open play on No. 1 Court at 1 p.m., followed by Coco Vandeweghe and Rybarikova.

But … what if the weather forecast is right?

If there were no men’s match on Centre Court, it would be no problem. Within the window of play that must necessarily conclude by an 11 p.m. neighbourhood curfew, they could get all four women’s matches in.

With the Djokovic-Mannarino match a wild card in that mix, there’s no chance that could happen. So what do they do? Play one, leaving the winner of the other to be the only player to have to play on back-to-back days? Play none, postponing both until Wednesday to at least give put that semi-final on even terms?

Likely the latter. Which means that five-time champion Venus and British hope Konta have a nice advantage.

Nadal, Djokovic matches postponed


ROLAND-GARROS – There was no men’s tennis at all at the French Open Tuesday after a three hour, 10-minute rain delay, on a day that already had a 2 p.m. start, meant postponement of both scheduled men’s quarter-finals.

The highly-anticipated showdown between Novak Djokovic and Dominic Thiem, as well as Rafael Nadal squaring off against countryman Pablo Carreño Busta, will happen Wednesday.

And that means that all four men’s quarter-finals will be played Wednesday.

On the plus side, the tournament will issue full refunds to those who had tickets Tuesday. Per their policies (see below), they don’t have to. So it’s a nice move.

Those two postponed matches will begin at 11 a.m. Wednesday – Nadal on Philippe-Chatrier, Djokovic on Suzanne Lenglen, as originally scheduled Tuesday.

The regularly scheduled matches – Kei Nishikori against Andy Murray (on Chatrier) and Stan Wawrinka vs. Marin Cilic (on Suzanne Lenglen) – will follow much later.

The weather was schizophrenic Tuesday in Paris, with blue skies to one side and dark, menacing clouds to the other at the very same time. Play was stopped for more than three hours in the middle of the women’s quarter-finals. (Stephanie Myles/Tennis.Life)





Postponement hurts the women

The remaining two women’s quarterfinals, Simona Halep vs. Elina Svitolina and Karolina Pliskova vs. Caroline Garcia, also will be played Wednesday.

Unfortunately for the women, they will be sandwiched between the men’s matches. Halep-Svitolina will be on Lenglen, and Garcia-Pliskova on Chatrier. That means a fairly uncertain start time.

The women’s semifinals will be played Thursday. And one of them is already known, after the women managed to complete play Tuesday after the rain delay. Unseeded Jelena Ostapenko of Latvia will play No. 30 seed Timea Bacsinszky of Switzerland.

Not quite what the forecasters had drawn up, right?

The men’s semi-finals, in separately ticketed sessions, will go Friday. The forecast looks quite good, at least until Sunday afternoon.

The rain delay – rare this year compared to the flood that was the 2016 French Open – naturally renewed calls for a retractable roof.

But in the end, with one roofed stadium, the competitive fairness aspect would go out the window. If Nadal and Carreño Busta got through their match on the biggest court but Djokovic and Thiem (expected to be a marathon) couldn’t play – or finish – until the next day, that would be pretty unfair to the winner of the latter match.

Especially if the winner of that match had to face a more rested Nadal.

At least, the way this has shaken out, all four men’s quarters will be played Wednesday. And all participants will have roughly the same amount of recovery time before Friday’s semifinals.

French Open refund policy

Until this year, the French Open’s official rain policy was that if less than 60 minutes of tennis was played, the entire cost of the ticket would be refunded (minus handling fees). If there was between an hour and an hour, 59 minutes of tennis, 50 per cent of the ticket was refunded. If there is two hours or more of tennis, nothing is refunded.

Mladenovic-Bacsinszky officially took an hour and 49 minutes. Ostapenko-Wozniacki took an hour and 53 minutes.

A new policy this year has one threshold – two hours of play. There was less than that on the two main courts, so a full refund. There was more than two hours on the field courts, so those with other tickets will not get a refund.