INDIAN WELLS, Calif. – Two practices within about 15 hours is all Maria Sharapova will get, before she starts her Indian Wells campaign Wednesday evening.
The 30-year-old Russian, unseeded, has not played the BNP Paribas Open in three years – since 2015, for reasons already well-documented.
But at least she got some time in under the lights during her first practice Monday night.
Tuesday morning, not on the official schedule, she returned to Court 9 to get more hitting in.
But she has not played against other female players, as most players will do to simulate match play before a big tournament. (Sharapova rare does this, though). She played a (very few) points against her hitting partner, Alex Kuznetsov.
Here’s what she looked like on Tuesday.
Low on match play
The two-time Indian Wells champion has played just one match since the Australian Open more than six weeks ago.
Her opponent, Naomi Osaka, is 10 years younger and ranked just four spots below Sharapova’s current No. 41.
They are the fifth match on the Stadium court, as the main draw play gets under way on Wednesday. There is not, though, an official night session. But this one will likely end up under the lights for the duration unless some of the earlier matches are really, really short.
An American is involved in each of the other four matchs on the main stadium. The only exception is Sharapova (a longtime U.S. resident) vs Osaka (also a nearly lifelong U.S. resident), the Russian against the Japanese.
But when 7 p.m. – the time of her second scheduled practice – came and went, those who were patiently waiting for her began to lose hope.
And then, suddenly, about 20 minutes later, there she was. Sharapova didn’t even stop by the locker room. Team Maria basically hopped out of their vehicle, ready to go, and straight to the court.
She warmed up carefully, and hit for about an hour.
Here’s what it looked like. It looked like (most of) the media had long left the building, as well.
By the time Sharapova was done, she was the last one woman standing on the practice courts. There also were a dozen fans who had waited all that time, and had to watch from a fair distance as she practiced.
She could have headed off the court, and down the back end of the complex, through the player’s field and out. But Sharapova headed in the other direction.
She went over to those very patient fans and signed and posed, before taking off into the night.
A major pro move.
Slow start to 2018
Sharapova made the semifinals in her opening tournament of the year in Shenzhen, China. But she lost in desultory fashion to a resurgent Angelique Kerber in the third round at the Australian Open. And she lost in the first round in Doha to the tricky Monica Niculescu.
Sharapova and the Romanian are just a few months apart in age. But despite the big overlap in their careers, this was the first time they had ever met on court.
By the end, Sharapova’s timing was completely shot. She began trading funky sliced forehands with Niculescu – who, at that point, given she’s perfected that shot, probably figured she had it in the bag.
That was nearly a month ago.
Sharapova’s won-loss record on the year is at 5-3. And that actually sounds better than it was.
There are three dangerous, unseeded floaters in this year’s BNP Paribas Open. Sharapova is one; Serena Williams and Victoria Azarenka are the others.
The draw did Sharapova no favours. She drew the unpredictable but very dangerous Naomi Osaka in the first round.
The humidity will be low – 15 per cent. So the magic formula that kicks in the heat rule may not happen. If it does, that would close the roofs on the three main stadiums. But more crucially, and less well-publicized, is that it also would stop play on all the outside courts.
Between 1 p.m. and 7 p.m., the temperature is expected to be 34C or higher. And that doesn’t factor in how much hotter than that it actually is on court.
So, in short – a scorcher. Followed by another one on Friday.
Halep suffered a Grade 1 sprain to her ankle during her first-round win Tuesday. So the state of that ankle may play a role in the outcome of the match against Bouchard.
The Canadian looked solid in a straight-sets win over Océane Dodin in the first round
 Anastasija Sevastova (LAT) vs. Maria Sharapova (RUS)
The two met twice within a two-month period last season. And both encounters were rather dramatic.
The first one came at the US Open – Sharapova’s first appearance there after she served her 15-month doping suspension. The Russian reached the fourth round, where Sevastova surprisingly ended her run.
In the fall, in the first round of Beijing, the two played a crazy match – 7-6 (3), 5-7, 7-6,(7). This time, Sharapova was the winner.
 Ashleigh Barty (AUS) vs. Camila Giorgi (ITA)
The Italian banger disappeared from the Tour the last few months of 2017, as she had reoccurring back issues. Her last match of the season was a first-round loss to Magdalena Rybarikova in the the first round of the US Open.
So she has sort of come out of nowhere to have a solid start to 2018.
Giorgi went from the qualifying through to the semifinals in Sydney last week – upsetting Petra Kvitova, Agnieszka Radwanska and Sloane Stephens along the way.
In Barty’s favor is that she has already played a hard hitter on Rod Laver Arena at night. She needed three sets to beat Aryna Sabalenka of Belarus in the first round. But at least she got used to the pace she can expect from Giorgi.
Men’s Matches to Watch
 Novak Djokovic (SRB) vs. Gaël Monfils (FRA)
It’s a tough one for a second-rounder. But that’s because Monfils’s ranking currently stands at No. 39.
Before he decided to take a last-minute wild card into Doha (and won the event), it was No. 46.
Djokovic may well find a sterner test Thursday than he did in his first round, when he had little trouble dispatching American Donald Young.
And he gets a Rod Laver Arena assignment for his second round, more befitting a six-time champion even though he’s only the No. 14 seed this year.
NOT in Monfils’ favor is the fact that his record against Djokovic is … 0-14.
 Juan Martin del Potro (ARG) vs. Karen Khachanov (RUS)
This is a heavyweight battle between two imposing human beings.
It might have been expected to be a closer battle earlier last season, when Khachanov really seemed to be a star on the rise. But he plateaued, and in the process ended things with the coach he’d had through his transition to the pros, Galo Blanco.
Del Potro started his season a week later than many. But he hoisted himself back into the top 10 with a finals appearance in Auckland last week, losing to Roberto Bautista-Agut.
In the quarterfinals of that event, del Potro defeated Khachanov 7-6, 6-3. Sounds about right. Add a set or two.
Hyeon Chung (KOR) vs. Daniil Medvedev (RUS)
This is a Next-Gen rematch between two of the players who competed in the special event in Milan last November.
Medvedev decided to start his 2018 season at a Challenger event in Playford, Australia where he lost in the first round to No. 379 Marinko Matosevic. His ranking would have gotten him into the main draw of pretty much all of the pre-Australian Open events, so it’s possible that someone forgot to enter him into anything early in 2018.
But Medvedev made up for lost time in Sydney, where he qualified and won the tournament.
Chung and Medvedev played in the semifinals of the Milan event, with Chung prevailing in five (short-format) sets.
Sharapova was playing in her 59th WTA Tour singles final.
Sabalenka was playing in the first WTA Tour final of her career, in only the fifth WTA Tour main draw of her career.
At times, she seized the moment beautifully. At others, she couldn’t find the court.
Sharapova weathered the powerful gusts, and waited for the inevitable errors. Although it had to feel somewhat like foreign territory to have so much of the match’s outcome in the hands of an opponent she likely had never heard of before Sunday.
Sabalenka’s junior career didn’t really presage her run in Tianjin or even her run to the semifinals in Tashkent, Uzbekistan a few weeks ago.
She rarely ventured outside a pretty restricted area during juniors (the Baltics and Finland, pretty much) and never broke into the top 200 in the ITF junior rankings.
At 17, she finished the 2015 season ranked No. 541. By the end of last year, she was at No. 155.
She made her Grand Slam debut at Wimbledon this year. And when the new rankings come out on Monday, she will be ranked No. 76.
Australian Open seed on radar
As for Sharapova, she will be inside the top 60 after earning the 36th title of her career.
And she can add to that this week. Sharapova took another wild card into the Moscow Premier event, which she will play for the first time since 2007.
If she somehow manages to win that, too, the Russian would definitely put herself in range to be seeded at the Australian Open, with early opportunities during the tune-up tournaments to seal that deal.
The crowd in Tianjin was fully Team Sharapova. Many of the fans were waving copies of her new memoir around. But they appreciated the efforts of Sabalenka as well.
Maria Sharapova has extended a helping hand to help the people of Puerto Rico.
The 30-year-old Russian, who visited the island last December to play an exhibition with the country’s biggest tennis star, Monica Puig, is helping Puig’s fundraising efforts in the wake of the devastating effects of Hurricane Maria.
Sharapova announced on Facebook Monday that she will donate all profits from her Sugarpova candy brand from today until the end of the year to support Puig’s hurricane fund.
The fun, which had an original goal of $25,000, already is at nearly $100,000, and growing.
Genie Bouchard will not have to suffer the rigors of qualifying this weekend.
The 23-year-old Canadian has been issued a wild card into the big Premier Mandatory tournament in Beijing. Bouchard left her home in Miami Wednesday to head for Asia for the first time during this Asian swing.
It will be Bouchard’s first tournament since losing in the first round of the US Open to Evgeniya Rodina of Russia.
The China Open offers nearly $6.4 million in prize money. Other than the 10-day events in Indian Wells and Miami, that’s the biggest purse on the WTA Tour.
Bouchard’s ranking stood at No. 74 at the entry deadline. So she was still 14 spots out of the 60-player main draw as of Thursday evening back home. The Canadian would have been unseeded in the qualifying draw as well.
There certainly was a possibility Bouchard would just end her season. Or, at the least, skip the Asian swing entirely. But with a main-draw spot in Beijing, and a main-draw spot in the International-level event in Hong Kong the following week, the issue of a match-rusty Bouchard trying to qualify was off the table.
She also withdrew from scheduled participation in the Korean Open in Seoul (main draw). And then, she also pulled out of qualifying for the Premier 5 tournament in Wuhan, China this week.
With the departure of coach Thomas Högstedt, Bouchard will not even have Roberto Brogin with her in Asia. Brogin, who worked with Bouchard when she first returned to the national training centre in Montreal from Florida nearly a decade ago, had filled in at various events in Högstedt’s absence this season.
He also has a full-time job with Tennis Canada at their training centre in Vancouver.
Blast from the past
Diego Ayala will be on board in Asia. Ayala, a coach based in south Florida, began the season with Bouchard down in Australia in 2015 after her split with Nick Saviano. Bouchard knew him from her younger days at Saviano’s academy.
Ayala’s agreement, we’re told is that he’ll be on board for the three tournaments remaining on Bouchard’s schedule for 2017.
So, barring anything unforeseen, that could well mean she intends to remain on the road for both Hong Kong and Luxemberg, two smaller events, to close it out.
At the time, Bouchard would not refer to Ayala as her “coach.” She preferred “hitting partner.” And upon returning home, she hired current Garbiñe Muguruza coach Sam Sumyk as a permanent replacement for Saviano.
But despite not playing any official warmup events, and under pressure to back up her breakthrough semifinal the previous year, Bouchard reached the quarterfinals in Australia with Ayala on board.
She lost in three sets to Maria Sharapova.
Coincidentally, Sharapova also has a wild card into Beijing, announced last month.
By any standard, not just the rather pedestrian standard of sports biographies.
Her insight into the Tour, life, and her own strengths and weaknesses is impressive. For someone with little formal education, who was hermetically sealed in a protective tennis bubble most of her formative years, she really is a grownup.
If that sounds condescending, it doesn’t mean to be. Most will admit that the life of a young sports prodigy is anything but designed to produce mature, functional, well-rounded human beings.
Sharapova has never been a sharer despite living on a very public stage. She has kept her personal life – including her love life – intensely private. For someone who is as famous as she is, that is no small feat.
So the story of her life, and her career so far, is to a great extent brand-new territory even for her most ardent fans.
That quest for privacy speaks to the fact that never really sought to be famous. What she wanted – what she still wants, even now – is to win.
“I want to beat everyone. It’s not just the winning. It’s the not being beaten,” she writes.
The impossible journey to the unstoppable dream
Almost everything you read about Sharapova’s early life, and her journey to the U.S. with her father, says she was seven when she arrived. In fact, she was still just six years old.
That’s where the book begins, albeit a bit unsteadily. There are certain inconstencies with dates, certain things remembered that don’t quite match up. That’s probably an editing issue more than anything.
But there’s no doubt, even allowing for some artistic license, that the journey of Yuri Sharapov and his tiny little girl from Sochi, Russia to international stardom was a flat-out miracle.
And the book picks up steam quickly.
The early years were a study in determination. If you ever wondered where Sharapova got it, her father clearly had it in spades.
He took whatever job he could to pay the rent. He would feed her, clothe her, and cut her hair. They shared a foldout couch that sagged in the middle in the living room of a Russian women’s apartment near Bollettieri’s academy.
It was there that Sharapova quickly learned that the girls in the locker room were not her friends. As much as she is criticized for it, there’s a long history behind it that makes it completely understandable.
She arrived with the old racket of fellow Sochi resident Yevgeny Kafelnikov, cut down to size, “a single change of clothes, and shoes from a factory in Minsk”.
The other girls laughed at her. Later, when she lived in the dorm, they went through her things when she wasn’t there.
Everyone wants a piece
Being so good, so young, worked against her. Most of the students at Bollettieri’s were the children of rich parents paying exorbitant fees. Sharapova dusting off kids three, four, five years older just brought home to those parents that their little Ashley or darling Peyton wasn’t going to be nearly good enough to be a professional tennis player.
According to Sharapova, Alla Kournikova, the mother of Anna, spread rumours that the little tennis prodigy had been kidnapped by Yuri Sharapova and spirited away to the U.S. Not wanting to risk a whiff of scandal, Bollettieri asked Sharapova to leave. She was “trouble,” Sharapova writes.
Holding her hostage
The next top was a club called El Conquistador, where a former player named Sekou Bangoura ran an academy.
Bangoura, whose son Sekou currently plays on the Challenger Tour, had dollar signs in his eyes. Sharapova writes that he held onto Yuri Sharapov’s visa and passport – effectively holding them hostage. He hired her father in lieu of paying academy tuition. Then he fired him and began charging for all the court time.
When they were about to get evicted for not paying the rent, he came up with a contract for her to sign.
Luckily, they didn’t.
Sharapov had met another tennis father, an oncologist, who brought it to a lawyer. The lawyer declared the contract no less than “indentured servitude”. It would have forced Sharapova to hand over a large percentage of her earnings to Bangoura for her entire career, in exchange for the scholarship during those early years.
Bollettieri eventually came back into the picture. But as much as the perception is out there that he was a huge influence on Sharapova’s early career, the reality is probably that Robert Landsdorp had more influence than anyone except her father.
Sharapova rose quickly. And the rest is history.
Maria and Yuri
Eventually, in an email, she asked her father to step aside. And she writes that he graciously did. It’s interesting that at this point in the book – whether subconsciously or by design – she no longer calls him “Yuri”.
She calls him “her father” – just as she calls mother Yelena “her mother” and her various coaches, for the most part “her coach.”
For all those years, there was only “Maria and Yuri”. In the end, everyone else – even her mother – was the supporting cast.
Sharapova writes a little about the two major romances of her life – with Slovenian pro basketball player Sasha Vujacic and current top-10 tennis player Grigor Dimitrov.
And she writes about her brief coaching experience with Jimmy Connors. She doesn’t remember it fondly.
Dishing the dirt
Even if you’re Maria Sharapova, it’s probably a challenge to sell a book if you don’t deliver some of the good stuff.
And the good stuff, in this case, is Serena Williams.
Sharapova admits Williams’s talent is a big reason she has beaten her only twice in 21 attempts (both before the 2008 shoulder surgery that left her without her biggest weapon, the serve).
But mostly, she attributes it to her shocking Williams in that 2004 Wimbledon final, when Sharapova was only 17 and Williams, 22.
They had first faced each other a few months before, in Miami.
“Her physical presence is much stronger and bigger than you realize watching on TV. She has thick arms and thick legs and is so intimidating and strong. And tall, really tall,” Sharapova writes. “It still feels that way. Even now, she can make me feel like a little girl.”
It’s a funny thing, perception.
Sharapova is 6-foot-2. You wouldn’t think she’d consider too many other women “really tall”. Especially not Williams, who is listed at 5-9. And when people see Williams in person, they usually remark she looks significantly smaller in person than on TV.
But on the court, to Sharapova, she seemed – seems – a giant.
“Serena’s strengths are like puzzle pieces that snap into my weaknesses,” she writes, most eloquently.
A portrait of Serena
“There is the serve and the groundstrokes and the game, but it’s also her attitude that defeats you. She looks across the net with something like disdain, as if you are unimportant and small. … Then there is her temper, which can be hot and unpredictable. She is not afraid to scream, throw her racket, bitch at the refs about calls she doesn’t like.
“It’s interesting at first, then it gets irritating. Irritating in a way that might be intended. She behaves as if she is the only player out there, the only person who counts. And you? You are a speed bump. You are a zero. Many great players have this mentality. Serena Williams just has it more.”
Sharapova believes that Williams plays so well against her because of that Wimbledon final.
“I think Serena hated me for being the skinny kid who beat her, against all odds, at Wimbledon. And I think she hated me for taking something that she believed belonged to her. I think she hated me for seeing her at her lowest moment. But mostly I think she hated me for hearing her cry. She’s never forgiven me for it.”
A few missing details
There are few areas most readers might have hoped she dug more deeply into. But it’s her book; she gets to set the agenda.
The positive test for meldonium, with which she begins and ends the book, is of huge interest to a lot of people. But Sharapova doesn’t reveal much beyond what’s already out there.
“I figured all I had to do was explain myself and it would be fixed. … It should’ve been easy to clear up,” she writes.
Again, Sharapova is a little hazy on the dates. The email announcing the positive test for meldonium arrived “three weeks into the season”. Or it came “a few weeks after the Australian Open”. Or it came “less than a week” before her shocker of a press conference, which took place on March 7, 2016.
She doesn’t really clear up much about what remains, at best, a polarizing situation.
But Sharapova clearly has no intention of shedding any more light on it. She’s just moving forward. Otherwise, she would have expanded upon the period when the health issues she was having necessitated her doctor advising her to take a medicine cabinet-sized list of supplements she took at one time, including the meldonium.
The tricky thing about writing a memoir while your career is still very much a going concern is that there surely are more interesting chapters to come.
From all indications, this book is going to sell very well. In retirement – whenever that is – she may well have to get to work on a sequel.
Maria Sharapova shares her thoughts on a lot of different subjects in her new memoir.
Many of the observations are incredibly astute. And surprisingly blunt and honest.
She talks about locker-room culture, and love on tour, and how she was used as a selling tool at a very young age – the same time she realized that tennis wasn’t just a game, it was a business. And she was the business.
Sharapova writes about how fame and success can be a big trap that sucks you in and puts your priorities all out of whack.
And so much more.
Here are just a few of her musings.
On the game:
“I know you want us to love this game – us loving it makes it more fun to watch. But we don’t love it. And we don’t hate it. It just is, and always has been.”
On the Bollettieri Academy:
“Rich kids for the most part, spoiled and sent down to live out a parental dream. I was a player -– one of only a handful on scholarship – who attracted the attention of those parents and got them to fork over all that money for tuition.That was out job, how we paid back Bollettieri. We were the advertisement. We attracted the deluded, wannabe tennis parents.”
On tennis besties:
“There are so many times when you see two players in the locker room, two girls, just chatting away like they’re best friends … Listening to them speak, they sound like best friends. And then, a few hours later, one of them is playing a match and the other is in the locker room watching the match on TV, looking pleased when her friend loses the point. That’s how it really is.”
On her (unrequited) teenage crush:
“Lanky, not too tall, with tousled hair, dark but dyed blond, and warm, mischievous eyes.” (Can you guess who she’s talking about?)
On Jimmy Connors:
“There was no structure, no thought-out plan for the practice, no particular drills or things we would work on. I would hit in the center of the court for hours at a time. No patterns, nothing. … I thought this was maybe the beginning. But weeks went by, and nothing had changed.
“The moments I enjoyed most were during water breaks, when he would talk about his career, his experiences, his mentality. All the things that had nothing to do with my game.”
“Winning f…s you up. First of all, it brings all kind of rewards which, if seen from the proper perspective, reveal themselves for what they really are: distractions, traps, names. Money, fame, opportunity. Each laurel and offer and ad and pitch takes you further from the game. It can turn your head. It can ruin you.
“And then there is what winning does to your mind, which is even more dangerous. It completely distorts your expectations. You start to feel entitled. When you win Wimbledon, you expect to win Wimbledon every year.”
On Russian rival Elena Dementieva:
“She was always giving me dirty looks, laser beams. Then, one day, her mother complained to my masseur. She told him, ‘Elena can’t get any deals in Japan because Maria has taken them all.’ “
On combining tennis and love:
“You’re never home, so the only way you can have a relationship is either with another tennis player, or with a person who gives up his life to travel with you, becoming part of your entourage. And who does that? Someone without a life of his own? That is, someone you’d probably not want to date in the first place. You see them in the players’ lounges or carrying bags. Not the coach, not the parent, but the boyfriend. By definition, any relationship you have is going to be long distance, which amounts to a kind of telephone buddy or pen pal.”
On Grigor Dimitrov:
“He has so much potential. He can do amazing things with his body. It’s a gift and also a curse. It’s gotten in his way, this need not only to win but to look beautiful doing it. It has to be perfect or he does not want it at all. It has to be unbelievable or forget it. That’s why he’s yet to fulfill all that potential.”
On the consequences of winning:
“Suddenly, the world, the only world you have ever known, is filled with girls who dislike you. They’re jealous of the money and fame. They want what you have and the only way to get it is to take you out. Every match becomes a big deal – if not for you, then for her. Everyone is waiting.”
On Justine Henin:
“She exposed my weaknesses better than any player. She makes you move, move and move. No matter what you hit, or where, she anticipates its direction and gets it back.. … Even when I’ve beaten her, she’s made me look bad and wore me out. I would go to sleep with her one-handed backhand staring me down.”
NEW YORK – When the US Open draw was made, it wouldn’t have been any shame at all had Maria Sharapova bowed out to world No. 2 Simona Halep in the first round.
It was a tough draw in her first Grand Slam appearance since Jan. 2016, when she tested positive for the banned substance meldonium and served a 15-month suspension.
But the 30-year-old Sharapova succeeded beyond most expectations except possibly her own. Until, it seemed, the body said no más against No. 16 seed Anastasija Sevastova Sunday in the fourth round.
Sevastova reached her second consecutive US Open quarter-final with a 5-7, 6-4, 6-2 win.
Start with a bang, end with a whimper
The best match Sharapova played was the first one against the snakebitten Halep.
It was a night match, to open the tournament, on the biggest tennis stage in the world, after waiting so long as both the French Open and Wimbledon declined to offer her wild cards. So the rush of adrenaline had to be through the roof.
It carried her through the forearm issues that had scuttled her summer plans.
After that, the Russian won her matches on grit and reputation and determination and experience even as the sleeve she had worn in practice reappeared on her right arm, and tape appeared on her left.
Still, she might have won this one, too.
Hawkeye non-challenge a turning point
Had she decided to call upon the Hawkeye challenge system on a shot of hers that hit the line, on break point at 4-5 in the the second set, Sharapova might well have won in straight sets – although we’ll never know.
She might have been preparing to face Sloane Stephens, who is mounting an impressive comeback of a completely different sort, from foot surgery, in the quarterfinals. Instead, Sevastova will try to take it one step further.
“Actually, just before my press conference I found out that the ball was in. I didn’t know that, so… Great news.
“Yeah, I mean, the umpire told me that he clearly saw it. So I went on his judgment. He kind of gave me a sign that it was … I mean, I wanted to challenge it. He said, ‘Are you sure?’ He said, ‘It was pretty long’,” Sharapova said. She was smiling/not really smiling. “I didn’t because I had one challenge. The reason I had one challenge is because I missed two. That’s on my end, not on his.”
Sharapova multiplied the unforced errors after that. She even came up a blister on her right middle finger. She said it was the first time in her career that happened.
Good run, regardless
“I think there are a lot of positives. You know, playing four matches, playing in front of a big crowd and fans. Just competing, you know, being in that competitive environment. That’s what I missed. You can’t replicate that anywhere, especially at a Grand Slam. So for me to come out, Monday night (against Halep) was a special night for me. I will always remember it. I’m very grateful to have had that opportunity to bring it,” she said.
“As I said, I came in not playing a lot of matches. We all know that. Didn’t have much practice. Obviously always disappointing to be on the losing end of things. But, yeah, I mean, reflecting back on the week, I can be happy.”
For Sevastova, who was a quarterfinalist in New York a year ago, it was the equivalent of a title defense. At the very least, a points defense.
Her ability to run, change the pace and not give an inconsistent Sharapova some rhythm to get back on track were the keys.
“If she hits you off the court, then you say, congratulations. But, again, I try to play smart. Sometimes it’s an advantage, sometimes not,” Sevastova said.
“When they’re hitting, they’re also making mistakes So if you move well, if you mix it up, you have always a chance.”
Interestingly, in the wake of some other WTA Tour players’ objections to the special treatment Sharapova has received since her return from suspension, Sevastova had no such extra motivation.
Only respect for Sharapova
“I think some players have that. But I don’t have that. I have great respect for her. I mean, I was 14 years old, I was playing under-14, at a tournament, and she was winning Wimbledon the same day, basically,” Sevastova said. “Yeah, I was confident. I was feeling it. But still you have to beat her.”
Sharapova said the focus the next few months will be to build back up her base of match play and endurance. With only five tournaments since April – since Jan. 2016, in fact – there is work to do.
She plans to start at the Premier event in Beijing next month, for which she has received a wild card.
“I want to play. I just want to play matches. There’s no secret recipe to that. … The good thing is I know I’m not going to be in an MRI machine tomorrow. I think that’s a pretty big positive. Had a few of those in the summer,” Sharapova said.
“Look, three-set matches are challenging. I love being part of them. There’s an element of concentration, focus, physicality that goes into all of it.
“There’s no doubt that not playing those matches certainly cost me today. I didn’t feel like I was thinking a little bit too much and not playing by instinct as maybe I would be in those situations.”
Ranking still a stumbling block
Sharapova’s ranking should clock in at exactly No. 100 after the US Open. That’s still a long way from her getting into the bigger events on her own. And at this point, with the six-week deadline cutoff, that will remain true for the rest of the season regardless of how she does.
It’s going in the right direction. But when you look at the rocket that has been Stephens’ rankings rise this summer upon her return after 11 months away, you can see how this summer was an opportunity lost.
The final question remains: with Sharapova and Shapovalov now out of the tournament, who will get those coveted Arthur Ashe Stadium stadiums slots every second day?
(We kid; there are options that don’t begin with “Sha” and end with “ov(a)”)
NEW YORK – Caroline Wozniacki, the No. 5 player in the world and a US Open semifinalist a year ago, wasn’t happy about going out so early.
She was upset by the dangerous Ekaterina Makarova in the second round Wednesday.
And afterwards, the veteran Dane was pretty outspoken about the tournament scheduling.
Wozniacki isn’t exactly a go-to for an inflammatory or even particularly insightful quote. She keeps it on the bland side, which is probably wise.
On Wednesday, Wozniacki’s beef was with the US Open scheduling.
She’s not the only one arching an eyebrow or shaking their head about that very thing.
“I think putting out a schedule where the no. 5 in the world is playing on court 5, fifth match on after 11, I think that’s unacceptable. And when you look on centre court … I understand completely the business side of things and everything. Someone who comes back from a drug sentence, performance-enhancing drugs. And then all of a sudden gets to play every single match on Center Court. I think that’s a questionable thing to do,” she said during her post-match press conference.
“It doesn’t set a good example. And I think someone who has fought their way back from injury and is five in the world deserves to play on a bigger court than Court No. 5,” Wozniacki added. “Finally they moved us to Court 17 which is a really nice court, actually, and we had great atmosphere out there. But yeah, I think sometimes they should look into what things to do in the future.”
Wozniacki’s reasoning doesn’t necessarily hold up. Because of the rain on Tuesday, the schedule was packed Wednesday with the balance of the first-round matches. All of the second-round matches were scheduled “not before 4 p.m.”, or even later.
But the subject of Maria Sharapova clearly hits a nerve.
While always acknowledging she understands it’s a business decision, Wozniacki has been blunt whenever the issue of awarding wild cards to the 30-year-old Russian has arisen.
It started with Stuttgart
Back in March, Wozniacki was fairly clear she didn’t think Sharapova, whose 15-month doping suspension ended in the middle of the clay-court event in Stuttgart sponsored by her own sponsor, Porsche, should get a wild card into that event.
“Obviously rules are twisted and turned in favour of who wants to do what. I think everyone deserves a second chance … but at the same time, I feel like when a player is banned for drugs, I think that someone should start from the bottom and fight their way back,” said Wozniacki, whose ranking was No. 14 at the time.
Wozniacki echoed those thoughts when asked if Sharapova should get a wild card into the French Open (in the end, Sharapova didn’t get one).
The reaction, famously, came from Sharapova agent Max Eisenbud.
With her return days away, Sharapova's agent Max Eisenbud decided to break his silence after these comments from Radwanska. Here he goes: pic.twitter.com/WXUVxooeK5